<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google CEO calls internet a Cesspool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.namecake.com/google-ceo-calls-internet-a-cesspool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.namecake.com/google-ceo-calls-internet-a-cesspool/</link>
	<description>NameCake is a domain name broker and marketplace for some of the most interesting domain names on the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 11:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Damir</title>
		<link>http://www.namecake.com/google-ceo-calls-internet-a-cesspool/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Damir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.namecake.com/?p=687#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Eric Schmidt (Google’s CEO) called the Internet a “cesspool” - The mediocre teacher tells. The good teacher explains. The superior teacher demonstrates. The great teacher inspires.  - William A. Ward</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Schmidt (Google’s CEO) called the Internet a “cesspool” - The mediocre teacher tells. The good teacher explains. The superior teacher demonstrates. The great teacher inspires.  - William A. Ward</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hennie meijer</title>
		<link>http://www.namecake.com/google-ceo-calls-internet-a-cesspool/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>hennie meijer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.namecake.com/?p=687#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Is Google not the company which causes this cesspool by rewarding all these keyword rich websites with good positions?
I would like to write freely about subjects, but what I get to hear from "seo-experts" that I should have 5-8 % keyword density. Obviously this leads to less quality content.
Maybe Mr Schmidt should apologize for causing this cesspool.

Some form of "rating system"(obviously fraud sensitive as well) from readers should be the main point for your position on search engine rankings.
All these "artificially" constructed backlinks are causing  low quality of the internet as well if you look at forums like Namepros for example. Do not blame the people who try to get these backlinks, but blame the ones who reward this with higher positions in the search engine ranking.
People post and react in blogs,forums and whatever just to get backlinks and make the cesspool bigger,because of this backlink policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Google not the company which causes this cesspool by rewarding all these keyword rich websites with good positions?<br />
I would like to write freely about subjects, but what I get to hear from &#8220;seo-experts&#8221; that I should have 5-8 % keyword density. Obviously this leads to less quality content.<br />
Maybe Mr Schmidt should apologize for causing this cesspool.</p>
<p>Some form of &#8220;rating system&#8221;(obviously fraud sensitive as well) from readers should be the main point for your position on search engine rankings.<br />
All these &#8220;artificially&#8221; constructed backlinks are causing  low quality of the internet as well if you look at forums like Namepros for example. Do not blame the people who try to get these backlinks, but blame the ones who reward this with higher positions in the search engine ranking.<br />
People post and react in blogs,forums and whatever just to get backlinks and make the cesspool bigger,because of this backlink policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

